Generate Formal Board Meeting Minutes Using AI

Tested prompts for ai generated board meeting minutes compared across 5 leading AI models.

BEST BY JUDGE SCORE Claude Opus 4.7 8/10

If you recorded or transcribed a board meeting and now need to turn that raw material into formal minutes, AI can do that in under a minute. The problem most corporate secretaries, executives, and office managers hit is the gap between a messy transcript or set of notes and the clean, structured document that boards, auditors, and regulators actually expect. Manually formatting that document is tedious, error-prone, and time-consuming, especially when you are doing it after every quarterly or monthly meeting.

AI-generated board meeting minutes solve the formatting and structure problem. You feed in your notes, transcript, or bullet points, and the model outputs a document that follows the conventional format: attendees, quorum confirmation, agenda items, motions, votes, action items, and adjournment. The output is not a final document, but it closes roughly 80 percent of the gap between raw notes and a ready-to-sign document.

This page shows you exactly how to prompt an AI model to generate board minutes, compares outputs from four different models, and explains what to watch for before you circulate or file the result. Whether you are a nonprofit board secretary, a startup preparing for a Series A, or a corporate governance team handling public company records, the approach here applies directly to your situation.

When to use this

This approach works best when you have a source document, a transcript, a recording transcript, or a detailed set of notes, and need to convert it into a formatted, formal record. It is the right tool when speed matters, when consistency across meeting records is a priority, or when the person responsible for minutes is not a trained corporate secretary.

  • You have a Zoom or Teams auto-transcript and need it converted into formal minutes within the same business day
  • Your nonprofit board meets quarterly and the secretary role rotates among volunteers with no legal or governance training
  • A startup needs standardized minutes for investor due diligence and does not yet have a dedicated legal or admin team
  • You are catching up on multiple back-to-back meetings and need to produce several sets of minutes efficiently
  • Your organization is standardizing its governance documentation and wants consistent formatting across all historical and future minutes

When this format breaks down

  • The meeting involved legally sensitive deliberations, such as litigation strategy or executive compensation decisions, where the precision of what was said versus what was decided matters to the point that AI paraphrasing creates legal risk
  • You have no source material at all. AI cannot fabricate accurate minutes from a meeting it was not given information about, and attempting this produces hallucinated details that could create a false record
  • Your jurisdiction or organization requires minutes to be certified by a licensed corporate secretary or attorney, in which case AI output is a drafting aid only and must be fully reviewed before it carries any official standing
  • The meeting included confidential attorney-client privileged communications that should not be entered into any third-party AI system due to waiver risk

The prompt we tested

You are an expert corporate secretary specializing in drafting formal board meeting minutes for governance and compliance purposes. Using the raw meeting content provided below, generate polished, board-ready minutes following these rules: Structure the output with these sections in order: Header (organization name, date, time, location/virtual), Attendees & Absentees, Call to Order, Approval of Prior Minutes, Agenda Items Discussed (with key points), Motions & Resolutions (including mover, seconder, vote tally), Action Items (with owner and deadline), and Adjournment. Use formal third-person past-tense language, avoid verbatim quotes, and keep each section concise but complete. Flag any missing standard information with [TO BE CONFIRMED] rather than fabricating details.

Meeting content:
Quarterly board meeting for Acme Health Inc. held March 14, 2025 at 10am via Zoom. Present: Chair Sarah Chen, directors Mark Liu, Priya Patel, David Okonkwo; CFO James Reed presenting. Discussed Q1 financials (revenue up 12% to $4.2M), approved the 2025 budget unanimously, and tabled the vendor contract with Medline until next quarter. Mark moved to approve the CFO's proposal to refinance the credit facility; Priya seconded; passed 4-0. Action: James to circulate refinancing term sheet by March 28. Meeting adjourned 11:45am.

Produce the complete formal board meeting minutes now.

Model comparison

ModelQualityCostLatencyTokens
Claude Opus 4.7 8 $0.1167 16.7s 508 / 1454
Claude Haiku 4.5 7 $0.0035 5.1s 347 / 630
GPT-5.4 8 $0.0090 7.6s 309 / 551
Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning 7 $0.0002 4.9s 450 / 300

Outputs

Claude Opus 4.7 8/10
# BOARD MEETING MINUTES

## Acme Health Inc.
**Quarterly Board Meeting**

**Date:** March 14, 2025
**Time:** 10:00 a.m. – 11:45 a.m. [Time Zone TO BE CONFIRMED]
**Location:** Virtual Meeting (Zoom)

---

### 1. Attendees & Absentees

**Directors Present:**
- Sarah Chen, Chair of the Board
- Mark Liu, Director
- Priya Patel, Director
- David Okonkwo, Director

**Management Present:**
- James Reed, Chief Financial Officer

**Absentees:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]

**Secretary of the Meeting:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]

A quorum was confirmed present.

---

### 2. Call to Order

The Chair, Sarah Chen, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. and welcomed those in attendance. The Chair confirmed that due notice of the meeting had been provided and that a quorum was established.

---

### 3. Approval of Prior Minutes

The minutes of the prior board meeting were presented for review and approval. [TO BE CONFIRMED – details regarding mover, seconder, and vote on approval of prior minutes were not recorded.]

---

### 4. Agenda Items Discussed

**4.1 Q1 Financial Review**
The CFO, James Reed, presented the financial results for the first quarter of 2025. The Board noted that revenue increased by 12% year-over-year, reaching $4.2 million. Directors reviewed the underlying drivers of the revenue growth and raised no objections to the results presented.

**4.2 2025 Annual Budget**
The 2025 annual budget was presented by the CFO for consideration and approval. Following discussion, the Board expressed its support for the proposed budget.

**4.3 Medline Vendor Contract**
The proposed vendor contract with Medline was brought before the Board for consideration. After deliberation, the Board resolved to table the matter until the next quarterly meeting, pending further review.

**4.4 Refinancing of Credit Facility**
The CFO presented a proposal to refinance the Company's existing credit facility. The Board reviewed the strategic and financial implications of the proposed refinancing.

---

### 5. Motions & Resolutions

**Resolution 2025-Q1-01 – Approval of 2025 Budget**
RESOLVED, that the 2025 annual budget as presented by management be, and hereby is, approved.
- **Mover:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]
- **Seconder:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]
- **Vote:** Approved unanimously.

**Resolution 2025-Q1-02 – Medline Vendor Contract**
RESOLVED, that consideration of the proposed vendor contract with Medline be tabled until the next quarterly board meeting.
- **Mover:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]
- **Seconder:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]
- **Vote:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]

**Resolution 2025-Q1-03 – Refinancing of Credit Facility**
RESOLVED, that the CFO's proposal to refinance the Company's credit facility be, and hereby is, approved.
- **Mover:** Mark Liu
- **Seconder:** Priya Patel
- **Vote:** Carried 4–0 (unanimous).

---

### 6. Action Items

| # | Action Item | Owner | Deadline |
|---|-------------|-------|----------|
| 1 | Circulate the refinancing term sheet to the Board for review. | James Reed, CFO | March 28, 2025 |
| 2 | Prepare updated Medline vendor contract materials for next quarter's meeting. | [TO BE CONFIRMED] | Next Quarterly Meeting |

---

### 7. Adjournment

There being no further business to come before the Board, the Chair adjourned the meeting at 11:45 a.m.

---

**Respectfully submitted,**

_________________________
[Name], Secretary of the Meeting
[TO BE CONFIRMED]

**Approved by:**

_________________________
Sarah Chen, Chair of the Board
Date: ______________________
Judge notes: The output is polished and production-ready, but the Motions & Resolutions section unnecessarily flags mover/seconder for the budget approval as [TO BE CONFIRMED] when "unanimously" in the source strongly implies all four directors approved it, and similarly the tabling of Medline lacked a formal motion framing in the source yet was given a formal resolution number without flagging that inconsistency.
Claude Haiku 4.5 7/10
# BOARD MEETING MINUTES
## ACME HEALTH INC.

---

**Date:** March 14, 2025  
**Time:** 10:00 a.m. – 11:45 a.m.  
**Location:** Virtual (Zoom)

---

## ATTENDEES & ABSENTEES

**Present:**
- Sarah Chen, Chair
- Mark Liu, Director
- Priya Patel, Director
- David Okonkwo, Director
- James Reed, Chief Financial Officer

**Absent:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]

---

## CALL TO ORDER

Chair Sarah Chen called the quarterly board meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.

---

## APPROVAL OF PRIOR MINUTES

[TO BE CONFIRMED—no reference to prior minutes approval provided in meeting content]

---

## AGENDA ITEMS DISCUSSED

### Q1 Financial Results

Chief Financial Officer James Reed presented the Company's financial performance for the first quarter of 2025. Revenue increased 12% year-over-year to $4.2 million. The Board received and reviewed the detailed financial statements.

### 2025 Annual Budget

The Board reviewed and discussed the proposed 2025 budget. Following deliberation, the Board unanimously approved the 2025 budget as presented.

### Medline Vendor Contract

The Board considered a proposed vendor contract with Medline. Following discussion, the Board determined to table this matter for further review and decision at a subsequent quarterly board meeting.

### Credit Facility Refinancing

The CFO presented a proposal to refinance the Company's existing credit facility. The Board discussed the terms, conditions, and anticipated benefits of the proposed refinancing.

---

## MOTIONS & RESOLUTIONS

**Resolution 1: Approval of 2025 Budget**

Upon motion by [TO BE CONFIRMED], seconded by [TO BE CONFIRMED], the Board unanimously approved the 2025 budget as presented.

*Vote: 4-0 (unanimously approved)*

**Resolution 2: Credit Facility Refinancing Proposal**

Upon motion by Mark Liu, seconded by Priya Patel, the Board approved the CFO's proposal to refinance the Company's credit facility.

*Vote: 4-0 (unanimously approved)*

---

## ACTION ITEMS

| Action Item | Assigned To | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Circulate credit facility refinancing term sheet to Board | James Reed, CFO | March 28, 2025 |

---

## ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business, Chair Sarah Chen adjourned the meeting at 11:45 a.m.

---

**Secretary:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]  
**Date Approved:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]
Judge notes: The output is well-structured and production-ready for most purposes, but the Motions & Resolutions section incorrectly marks the budget motion mover/seconder as [TO BE CONFIRMED] when the source material clearly states it was approved "unanimously" (implying the same quorum), and additionally the budget approval was already captured as a resolution under Agenda Items, creating redundancy and inconsistency with the "mover/seconder" handling between the two resolutions.
GPT-5.4 8/10
**Acme Health Inc.**  
**Board of Directors Quarterly Meeting Minutes**  

**Date:** March 14, 2025  
**Time:** 10:00 a.m.  
**Location/Format:** Zoom videoconference  

---

### Attendees & Absentees
**Present:**  
- Sarah Chen, Chair  
- Mark Liu, Director  
- Priya Patel, Director  
- David Okonkwo, Director  
- James Reed, Chief Financial Officer (presenting)

**Absent:**  
- [TO BE CONFIRMED]

---

### Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chair Sarah Chen at 10:00 a.m.

---

### Approval of Prior Minutes
Approval of the prior meeting minutes was [TO BE CONFIRMED].

---

### Agenda Items Discussed
1. **Q1 Financial Review**  
   The Board reviewed the first quarter financial results. Management reported that revenue increased by 12% to **$4.2 million**.

2. **2025 Budget**  
   The Board considered the proposed 2025 budget and approved it unanimously.

3. **Credit Facility Refinancing Proposal**  
   The Board reviewed the Chief Financial Officer’s proposal to refinance the company’s credit facility and discussed the proposed next steps.

4. **Medline Vendor Contract**  
   The Board discussed the vendor contract with Medline. Further consideration was deferred, and the matter was tabled until the next quarter.

---

### Motions & Resolutions
1. **Approval of 2025 Budget**  
   **Resolution:** The Board approved the 2025 budget.  
   **Mover:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]  
   **Seconder:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]  
   **Vote:** Unanimously approved.

2. **Approval of Credit Facility Refinancing Proposal**  
   **Motion:** Director Mark Liu moved to approve the Chief Financial Officer’s proposal to refinance the credit facility. Director Priya Patel seconded the motion.  
   **Vote:** Passed **4-0**.  
   **Resolution:** The motion was adopted.

3. **Medline Vendor Contract**  
   **Resolution:** Consideration of the Medline vendor contract was tabled until the next quarter.  
   **Mover:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]  
   **Seconder:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]  
   **Vote:** [TO BE CONFIRMED]

---

### Action Items
- **James Reed** to circulate the refinancing term sheet by **March 28, 2025**.

---

### Adjournment
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at **11:45 a.m.**
Judge notes: The output is clean and production-ready, but flagging the 2025 budget approval's mover/seconder as [TO BE CONFIRMED] is slightly awkward since the source explicitly states "approved unanimously" without a formal motion—the minutes could have noted this distinction rather than implying a motion was made but undocumented.
Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning 7/10
### Acme Health Inc.  
**Board of Directors Quarterly Meeting**  
**Date:** March 14, 2025  
**Time:** 10:00 AM - 11:45 AM  
**Location:** Via Zoom (virtual)  

### Attendees & Absentees  
**Present:** Chair Sarah Chen; Directors Mark Liu, Priya Patel, David Okonkwo; CFO James Reed (presenting).  
**Absent:** [TO BE CONFIRMED] (none reported).  

### Call to Order  
The Chair called the meeting to order at 10:00 AM.  

### Approval of Prior Minutes  
[TO BE CONFIRMED] (not discussed).  

### Agenda Items Discussed  
- Reviewed Q1 financial results, noting revenue increased 12% to $4.2 million.  
- Considered the 2025 budget, which was subsequently approved.  
- Tabled the vendor contract with Medline until the next quarter.  

### Motions & Resolutions  
- The Board approved the 2025 budget unanimously ([TO BE CONFIRMED]: mover, seconder, formal vote tally not specified).  
- Director Mark Liu moved to approve the CFO's proposal to refinance the credit facility; Director Priya Patel seconded; the motion passed 4-0.  

### Action Items  
- CFO James Reed to circulate the refinancing term sheet by March 28, 2025.  

### Adjournment  
The meeting adjourned at 11:45 AM.
Judge notes: The minutes are clean and well-structured, but the budget approval motion lacks the mover/seconder details the source material implies existed, and the "Approval of Prior Minutes" section uses awkward placeholder phrasing that would need editing before production use.

What makes these work

  1. 01
    Give the model structured inputs

    AI produces significantly better minutes when your input is organized, even loosely, rather than a raw stream-of-consciousness dump. Label sections like attendees, agenda items, votes, and action items before you paste. The more your input mirrors the output structure, the less the model has to infer, which reduces errors.

  2. 02
    Specify the formality register you need

    Board minutes vary from terse legal-style resolutions to narrative summaries depending on the organization. Tell the model explicitly: 'Use formal resolution language (RESOLVED:)' or 'Write in narrative paragraph style, not resolution format.' Without that instruction, models often default to a middle ground that fits neither a startup's legal team nor a nonprofit's culture.

  3. 03
    Include vote counts and dissents explicitly

    AI cannot infer votes from vague language like 'the board agreed.' If a vote was taken, include the count and any dissents or abstentions in your input. Votes are legally significant details that must be accurate in the official record, and a model will not make them up correctly if they are missing.

  4. 04
    Always human-review before filing or distributing

    AI-generated minutes are a strong first draft, not a final document. Review for factual accuracy, confirm names and titles are correct, verify that action item owners match what was actually said, and check that the tone is appropriate for your organization. A five-minute review protects against the risk of an inaccurate official record.

More example scenarios

#01 · Nonprofit board quarterly meeting
Input
Generate formal board meeting minutes. Organization: Riverside Community Foundation. Date: June 10, 2025. Location: Zoom. Present: Chair Dana Okafor, Treasurer Miguel Santos, Secretary Priya Nair, Directors James Cho and Felicia Drummond. Quorum confirmed. Topics: approved April minutes, reviewed Q1 financials (surplus of $12,400), voted to allocate $8,000 to the summer literacy program (4-1, Cho opposed), tabled discussion on new grant cycle until August meeting. Meeting adjourned 7:42 PM.
Expected output
MINUTES OF THE QUARTERLY BOARD MEETING, Riverside Community Foundation. Date: June 10, 2025. A quorum being present, Chair Okafor called the meeting to order. RESOLVED: Minutes of the April meeting were approved. Treasurer Santos presented Q1 financials reflecting a surplus of $12,400. RESOLVED: $8,000 allocated to the summer literacy program (Vote: 4-1, Director Cho opposed). Discussion of the new grant cycle was tabled to the August meeting. Meeting adjourned at 7:42 PM. Respectfully submitted, Priya Nair, Secretary.
#02 · Startup board meeting ahead of Series A due diligence
Input
Draft formal board minutes. Company: Velostack Inc. Date: May 28, 2025. Directors present: CEO Amara Hill, Investor Director Tom Bryce (Apex Ventures), Independent Director Susan Park. Agenda: approval of 2024 audited financials, authorization of Series A term sheet with Apex at $9M at $30M pre-money valuation, approval of new option pool of 1.2M shares. All resolutions passed unanimously. No dissents or abstentions.
Expected output
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, Velostack Inc. Date: May 28, 2025. All directors being present, the meeting was duly convened. RESOLVED: The 2024 audited financial statements are approved. RESOLVED: The Board authorizes execution of the Series A term sheet with Apex Ventures for $9,000,000 at a $30,000,000 pre-money valuation. RESOLVED: An option pool of 1,200,000 shares is approved. All resolutions passed unanimously. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
#03 · Public company audit committee meeting
Input
Write formal audit committee minutes. Company: Hartwell Industries Inc. Date: April 15, 2025. Members: Chair Lorraine Beck (Independent), Members David Fung and Carol Trent (both Independent). Also present: CFO Raymond Park, External Auditors (Grant & Associates, represented by lead partner Sheila Moss). Topics: reviewed draft 10-Q for Q1 2025, auditors reported no material weaknesses, one significant deficiency noted in accounts payable reconciliation process, management presented remediation plan with 60-day timeline, committee approved remediation plan.
Expected output
MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING, Hartwell Industries Inc. Date: April 15, 2025. Chair Beck confirmed all members present and quorum achieved. The Committee reviewed the draft Form 10-Q for Q1 2025. External Auditors reported no material weaknesses. One significant deficiency was identified in the accounts payable reconciliation process. Management presented a remediation plan with a 60-day completion timeline. RESOLVED: The Audit Committee approves the proposed remediation plan. The Committee Chair will report findings to the full Board at the next scheduled meeting. Meeting adjourned.
#04 · HOA board monthly meeting
Input
Create formal HOA board minutes. Association: Maplewood Heights HOA. Date: July 8, 2025. Present: President Kevin Ruiz, VP Sandra Lee, Treasurer Bob Marsh, Secretary Donna Piccolo, Member-at-Large Greg Anton. Homeowner open forum: resident complaint about pool hours (board to review policy). Approved June minutes. Reviewed June financials, reserve fund at $142,000. Voted to approve landscaping contract renewal with Green Edge for $24,000 annually, unanimous. Next meeting August 12.
Expected output
MINUTES OF THE MONTHLY BOARD MEETING, Maplewood Heights HOA. Date: July 8, 2025. President Ruiz called the meeting to order with quorum confirmed. Open Forum: A resident raised a concern regarding pool operating hours; the Board agreed to review the current policy and respond at the August meeting. RESOLVED: Minutes of the June meeting were approved. Treasurer Marsh reported reserve fund balance of $142,000. RESOLVED: The landscaping services contract with Green Edge is renewed at $24,000 annually (Vote: Unanimous). Next meeting: August 12, 2025. Meeting adjourned.
#05 · University advisory board annual meeting
Input
Generate board minutes. Institution: Coastal University College of Business Advisory Board. Date: March 3, 2025. Attendees: Dean Patricia Voss (non-voting), Chair Marcus Webb, Members: Ingrid Halvorsen, Tomas Rivera, Nadia Osei, Kai Blackwood. Quorum met. Approved prior year minutes. Dean's report: enrollment up 8%, two new faculty hires in analytics. Board voted to create a new scholarship fund of $50,000 seeded by member donations, approved 5-0. Agreed to hold two meetings per year instead of one going forward.
Expected output
MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL MEETING, Coastal University College of Business Advisory Board. Date: March 3, 2025. Chair Webb confirmed quorum and called the meeting to order. RESOLVED: Minutes from the prior annual meeting were approved. Dean Voss reported an 8% increase in enrollment and two new faculty appointments in the analytics discipline. RESOLVED: The Board approves the establishment of a scholarship fund with an initial corpus of $50,000, to be seeded by member contributions (Vote: 5-0). The Board agreed to convene twice annually beginning in the current academic year. Meeting adjourned.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Pasting raw transcripts without cleanup

    Feeding a 10,000-word Zoom transcript directly into a model and asking for minutes often produces an output that is too long, buries key decisions in summary prose, and includes filler conversation. Pre-process your transcript: strip off-topic tangents, label each agenda item, and note the actual decisions. Your output quality will be dramatically better.

  • Skipping attendee and quorum details

    Many users focus on actions and votes but forget to include who was present and whether quorum was achieved. These are not procedural formalities. For most organizations, minutes without quorum confirmation are incomplete and potentially invalid. Always include a full attendee list and note whether quorum was met.

  • Treating AI output as legally final

    AI-generated minutes are a draft. They are not signed, they are not certified, and they have not been reviewed and approved by the board itself, which is the standard requirement for minutes to become an official record. Circulating AI output as the final minutes without the review and approval step creates a governance risk.

  • Using vague action item language

    If your notes say 'the team will follow up on the vendor contract,' the AI will reproduce that vagueness. Action items in minutes should specify who is responsible and by when. Provide that specificity in your input, or the AI will not add it for you, and your minutes will be useless as an accountability tool.

  • Ignoring confidentiality before using cloud AI tools

    Board meetings frequently involve material nonpublic information, personnel matters, or attorney-client communications. Before pasting meeting content into any AI tool, confirm your organization's data handling policy and the tool's data privacy terms. For sensitive meetings, use a locally-run model or ensure the platform offers enterprise-grade data isolation.

Related queries

Frequently asked questions

Are AI generated board meeting minutes legally valid?

AI-generated minutes are legally valid once they go through the same approval process as any other minutes: reviewed by the secretary, distributed to board members, and formally approved at the subsequent meeting. The method of drafting does not affect validity. What matters is accuracy, completeness, and the approval process your bylaws require.

What is the best AI tool for generating board meeting minutes?

General-purpose large language models like GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini all perform well when given a well-structured input. Purpose-built meeting tools like Otter.ai, Fireflies, or Notion AI can auto-generate minutes directly from a recording. The right choice depends on whether you want a transcript-to-minutes pipeline or a prompt-based drafting tool for notes you have already organized.

Can AI generate minutes directly from a Zoom or Teams recording?

Not directly in most cases, but in two steps it works well. First, get a transcript from Zoom, Teams, or a third-party transcription tool. Then paste that transcript, with some cleanup, into a language model with a prompt asking for formal minutes. Some dedicated meeting tools connect to Zoom and handle both steps automatically.

How accurate are AI generated board meeting minutes?

Accuracy depends almost entirely on the quality of the input. If your notes or transcript clearly state who said what, what was voted on, and what decisions were made, the AI output will be highly accurate at capturing those facts in the right format. If the input is ambiguous or incomplete, the model will either skip details or make plausible but incorrect inferences, which is why human review is essential.

What should board meeting minutes always include?

At a minimum: organization name, date and location, names of attendees and absentees, confirmation of quorum, approval of prior minutes, summary of each agenda item discussed, the exact language of any motions made, vote counts including dissents and abstentions, any action items with owners and deadlines, and the time of adjournment. The AI prompt should explicitly request all of these.

Can I use AI to generate minutes for a nonprofit board?

Yes, and nonprofits are one of the most common use cases because the secretary role often rotates among volunteers who lack formal governance training. AI handles the formatting and structure, which is where most volunteer secretaries struggle. Just ensure the output is reviewed before distribution and formally approved by the board, as IRS and state nonprofit compliance requirements still apply.