Solve LeetCode and Algorithm Problems in Python with AI

Tested prompts for ai solve python coding problems compared across 5 leading AI models.

BEST BY JUDGE SCORE Claude Haiku 4.5 8/10

If you are stuck on a LeetCode problem, a coding interview question, or a tricky algorithm in Python, AI models can walk you through a working solution in seconds. The search query 'ai solve python coding problems' usually comes from someone preparing for a technical interview, grinding algorithm challenges, or debugging a solution that is almost right but not quite. This page tests four leading AI models on the same Python coding problem so you can see exactly which one gives the clearest, most correct, and most interview-ready answer.

What makes AI genuinely useful here is not just getting a working code block. It is getting an explanation of the time complexity, the edge cases the solution handles, and why one approach beats another. A brute-force O(n^2) answer will get you a failing LeetCode verdict or a thumbs-down in an interview. You need the optimal solution with reasoning attached.

The prompt tested on this page targets a classic algorithm problem in Python. The four model outputs below show real differences in code quality, explanation depth, and how each model handles edge cases. The comparison table at the bottom tells you which model to reach for depending on your situation.

When to use this

This approach works best when you have a specific, bounded coding problem with a clear input and expected output. Whether you are practicing for FAANG interviews, working through a LeetCode contest, studying data structures, or need a fast reference implementation of a known algorithm, asking an AI to solve and explain a Python coding problem is a high-leverage move.

  • Preparing for technical coding interviews and need optimal Python solutions with Big-O analysis
  • Stuck on a LeetCode medium or hard problem after spending more than 20 minutes on your own attempt
  • Learning a new algorithm or data structure and want a clean, annotated Python implementation to study
  • Reviewing multiple solution approaches to the same problem to understand trade-offs before an interview
  • Generating test cases and edge case coverage for a Python function you already wrote

When this format breaks down

  • When the problem requires deep domain-specific business logic that the AI has no context about, such as a proprietary scoring system or internal data schema, the output will be syntactically correct but semantically wrong.
  • For production-critical code that will run at scale without human review. AI-generated solutions can miss subtle off-by-one errors or fail on specific edge cases that only appear in real data distributions.
  • When you are actively in a timed interview assessment that prohibits AI tool use. Using AI here violates the assessment terms and leaves you unable to defend the code if asked to explain your reasoning line by line.
  • If the problem is so vague that it lacks defined inputs and outputs. Open-ended system design questions need architectural discussion, not a code snippet, and AI tends to give shallow answers to poorly scoped problems.

The prompt we tested

You are an expert Python algorithm tutor and competitive programmer. Solve the following coding problem in Python, following these rules:

Structure your response as: (1) a brief problem restatement and approach summary, (2) time and space complexity analysis, (3) clean, commented Python 3 code inside a single code block using descriptive variable names, and (4) a short walkthrough of the code against one example input. Prefer the optimal solution, but mention a brute-force alternative in one line if relevant.

Problem:
Given an array of integers nums and an integer target, return the indices of the two numbers such that they add up to target. You may assume that each input has exactly one solution, and you may not use the same element twice. Example: nums = [2,7,11,15], target = 9 should return [0,1].

Provide your complete solution now.

Model comparison

ModelQualityCostLatencyTokens
Claude Opus 4.7 8 $0.0616 10.5s 270 / 767
Claude Haiku 4.5 8 $0.0033 4.6s 202 / 622
GPT-5.4 8 $0.0085 8.4s 186 / 535
Gemini 2.5 Pro 8 $0.0051 12.3s 187 / 978
Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning 8 $0.0003 4.5s 336 / 372

Outputs

Claude Opus 4.7 8/10
## Problem Restatement & Approach

Given an array `nums` and a `target`, find two distinct indices `i` and `j` such that `nums[i] + nums[j] == target`.

**Approach:** Use a hash map (dictionary) to store each number's index as we iterate. For each number `x`, check if its complement `target - x` has already been seen. If yes, we've found the pair; otherwise, record `x`'s index and continue.

*Brute-force alternative:* Check every pair with two nested loops in O(n²) time.

## Complexity Analysis

- **Time:** O(n) — single pass through the array, with O(1) average-case dictionary lookups/insertions.
- **Space:** O(n) — the hash map may store up to n entries in the worst case.

## Code

```python
from typing import List

def two_sum(nums: List[int], target: int) -> List[int]:
    """
    Returns indices of the two numbers in `nums` that add up to `target`.
    Assumes exactly one valid solution exists.
    """
    # Maps a previously seen number -> its index in nums
    seen_index_of = {}

    for current_index, current_value in enumerate(nums):
        complement = target - current_value

        # If complement was seen earlier, we've found the pair
        if complement in seen_index_of:
            return [seen_index_of[complement], current_index]

        # Record current value's index for future complement checks
        seen_index_of[current_value] = current_index

    # Per problem constraints, this line should never execute
    return []


# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
    print(two_sum([2, 7, 11, 15], 9))  # Expected: [0, 1]
```

## Walkthrough on `nums = [2, 7, 11, 15]`, `target = 9`

1. **Index 0, value 2:** complement = 9 − 2 = 7. `seen_index_of` is empty, so 7 not found. Store `{2: 0}`.
2. **Index 1, value 7:** complement = 9 − 7 = 2. `2` is in `seen_index_of` at index 0. Return `[0, 1]`. ✅

The algorithm returns on the first hit, so it never examines indices 2 or 3. This single-pass hash-map technique is the standard optimal solution for the Two Sum problem.
Judge notes: Fully correct, well-structured, and production-ready, but the problem is trivially simple (LeetCode #1 Two Sum) and the solution contains no notable depth, edge case discussion, or complexity trade-off analysis beyond the obvious, making it fall short of a 9.
Claude Haiku 4.5 8/10
# Two Sum Problem Solution

## Problem Restatement & Approach

We need to find two distinct indices in an array where the values sum to a target. The optimal approach uses a **hash map** to store values we've seen along with their indices. As we iterate through the array, for each number, we check if `target - current_number` exists in our map. This gives us O(n) time complexity instead of the brute-force O(n²) nested loop approach.

## Complexity Analysis

- **Time Complexity:** O(n) — single pass through the array with O(1) hash map lookups
- **Space Complexity:** O(n) — hash map stores up to n elements

## Solution

```python
def twoSum(nums: list[int], target: int) -> list[int]:
    """
    Find two indices in nums that sum to target.
    
    Args:
        nums: List of integers
        target: Target sum value
    
    Returns:
        List of two indices [i, j] where nums[i] + nums[j] == target
    """
    # Dictionary to store value -> index mapping
    seen = {}
    
    for current_index, current_num in enumerate(nums):
        # Calculate what number we need to reach the target
        complement = target - current_num
        
        # Check if we've already seen the complement
        if complement in seen:
            # Return indices: complement's index first, current index second
            return [seen[complement], current_index]
        
        # Store current number and its index for future lookups
        seen[current_num] = current_index
    
    # No solution found (shouldn't happen per problem statement)
    return []
```

## Walkthrough with Example

**Input:** `nums = [2,7,11,15]`, `target = 9`

| Iteration | current_index | current_num | complement | seen dict | Action |
|-----------|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | {} | 7 not in seen; store {2: 0} |
| 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | {2: 0} | 2 is in seen! Return [0, 1] ✓ |

**Output:** `[0, 1]` (because `nums[0] + nums[1] = 2 + 7 = 9`)

The algorithm finds that when we reach index 1 (value 7), we need 2 to sum to 9, and we've already seen 2 at index 0, so we immediately return the answer.
Judge notes: The solution is clean, correct, and well-structured with a nice table walkthrough, but it's a textbook LeetCode problem with a standard solution that requires no creative insight—the brute-force mention is literally one clause in a sentence rather than the "one line" the prompt specified.
GPT-5.4 8/10
### 1) Problem restatement and approach summary

We need to find **two different indices** in `nums` such that their values add up to `target`. The problem guarantees **exactly one valid answer**.

#### Optimal approach: hash map
We scan the array once and store numbers we have already seen in a dictionary:

- For each number `value` at index `i`, compute its needed partner:
  `complement = target - value`
- If `complement` was seen earlier, we immediately return its index and `i`
- Otherwise, store `value -> i` in the dictionary

This gives a fast **one-pass** solution.

> Brute-force alternative: check every pair with two nested loops, which takes `O(n^2)` time.

---

### 2) Time and space complexity

- **Time complexity:** `O(n)`  
  Each element is processed once, and dictionary lookups are average `O(1)`.

- **Space complexity:** `O(n)`  
  In the worst case, we store up to all elements in the hash map.

---

### 3) Python 3 code

```python
from typing import List

class Solution:
    def twoSum(self, nums: List[int], target: int) -> List[int]:
        # Maps a number to the index where it was first seen
        seen_indices = {}

        for current_index, current_value in enumerate(nums):
            complement = target - current_value

            # If we've already seen the needed complement,
            # we have found the two indices
            if complement in seen_indices:
                return [seen_indices[complement], current_index]

            # Otherwise, store the current value and its index
            seen_indices[current_value] = current_index

        # Problem guarantees exactly one solution, so this line is never reached
        return []
```

---

### 4) Short walkthrough with example

Input:
`nums = [2, 7, 11, 15]`, `target = 9`

Step-by-step:

- Start with empty map: `seen_indices = {}`
- Index `0`, value `2`
  - complement = `9 - 2 = 7`
  - `7` not in map
  - store `2: 0`
- Index `1`, value `7`
  - complement = `9 - 7 = 2`
  - `2` is in map at index `0`
  - return `[0, 1]`

So the answer is:

`[0, 1]`
Judge notes: Correct, clean, and well-structured solution, but this is a trivially simple LeetCode problem (Easy #1) that doesn't meaningfully test the system's algorithm-solving capabilities, so the output earns no credit for tackling complexity.
Gemini 2.5 Pro 8/10
### 1. Problem Restatement and Approach Summary

The goal is to find the indices of two distinct numbers in an array that sum to a given target. The problem guarantees a unique solution exists.

A simple brute-force approach would be to check every pair of numbers, which takes O(n²) time. However, a more optimal solution uses a hash map (a Python dictionary) to achieve linear time complexity. We can iterate through the array once. For each element, we calculate its "complement" (i.e., `target - current_number`). If this complement is already in our hash map, we have found our pair and can return their indices. If not, we add the current number and its index to the map for future lookups.

### 2. Time and Space Complexity Analysis

*   **Time Complexity: O(n)**
    We traverse the list containing `n` elements only once. Each lookup and insertion in the hash map takes, on average, O(1) time.

*   **Space Complexity: O(n)**
    In the worst-case scenario, we might store all `n` elements in the hash map before finding the solution (e.g., if the two numbers that sum to the target are the last two elements in the array).

### 3. Python 3 Code

```python
from typing import List

def two_sum(nums: List[int], target: int) -> List[int]:
    """
    Finds two numbers in a list that sum up to a specific target.

    This function uses a one-pass hash map approach for optimal performance.
    
    Args:
        nums: A list of integers.
        target: The target integer sum.

    Returns:
        A list containing the indices of the two numbers.
    """
    # Dictionary to store numbers we've seen and their indices.
    # Key: number, Value: index
    num_to_index_map = {}

    # Enumerate through the list to get both index and value.
    for current_index, current_num in enumerate(nums):
        # Calculate the complement needed to reach the target.
        complement = target - current_num

        # Check if the complement exists in our map.
        if complement in num_to_index_map:
            # If it exists, we found our solution.
            # Return the index of the complement and the current number's index.
            return [num_to_index_map[complement], current_index]
        
        # If the complement is not found, add the current number and its index to the map.
        # We do this after the check to avoid using the same element twice.
        num_to_index_map[current_num] = current_index
        
    # The problem statement guarantees a solution exists, so this part is unreachable.
    # Included for completeness in a general case.
    return []

```

### 4. Code Walkthrough

Let's trace the execution with the example `nums = [2, 7, 11, 15]` and `target = 9`.

1.  **Initialization:**
    *   `num_to_index_map` is an empty dictionary: `{}`.

2.  **First Iteration (index = 0):**
    *   `current_index` is `0`, `current_num` is `2`.
    *   `complement` is `9 - 2 = 7`.
    *   Is `7` in `num_to_index_map`? No, the map is empty.
    *   Add `current_num` and `current_index` to the map: `num_to_index_map` becomes `{2: 0}`.

3.  **Second Iteration (index = 1):**
    *   `current_index` is `1`, `current_num` is `7`.
    *   `complement` is `9 - 7 = 2`.
    *   Is `2` in `num_to_index_map`? Yes, it is! The key `2` exists.
    *   We have found the solution. We return the index of the complement from the map, which is `num_to_index_map[2]` (value `0`), and the `current_index` (`1`).
    *   The function returns `[0, 1]`. The loop terminates.
Judge notes: Solid, production-ready solution with clear structure and walkthrough, but the problem (Two Sum) is trivially simple—a truly demanding user would expect a harder problem to demonstrate real algorithmic depth, and the brute-force mention is buried in the approach rather than given its own clearly labeled line as instructed.
Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning 8/10
### 1. Problem Restatement and Approach Summary
Given an array `nums` and `target`, find and return the indices of exactly two distinct elements that sum to `target`. Use a single-pass hash map (dictionary) to store seen numbers and their indices: for each `num` at index `i`, check if `(target - num)` is in the map; if yes, return the indices; else, store `num` at `i`. (Brute-force alternative: O(n²) nested loops checking every pair.)

### 2. Time and Space Complexity Analysis
- **Time**: O(n), single pass through the array.
- **Space**: O(n), worst case stores all elements in the hash map.

### 3. Clean, Commented Python 3 Code
```python
from typing import List

def twoSum(nums: List[int], target: int) -> List[int]:
    """
    Finds two indices in nums that sum to target using a hash map.
    Assumes exactly one solution exists.
    """
    seen = {}  # Dictionary to store number -> index mappings
    for i, num in enumerate(nums):
        complement = target - num
        if complement in seen:
            return [seen[complement], i]  # Found the pair
        seen[num] = i  # Store current num's index
    return []  # No solution (though problem guarantees one)
```

### 4. Walkthrough with Example
For `nums = [2,7,11,15]`, `target = 9`:
- i=0, num=2: complement=7 not in {}, store {2:0}
- i=1, num=7: complement=2 in {}, return [0,1]
Matches expected output `[0,1]`.
Judge notes: Fully correct and well-structured solution, but the problem is trivially simple (LeetCode #1) and the response handles it adequately without demonstrating depth that would justify a higher score — edge cases (duplicates, negative numbers) go unmentioned.

What makes these work

  1. 01
    Name the algorithm or pattern

    Instead of asking 'how do I solve this problem,' specify the technique you want: sliding window, BFS, dynamic programming, or binary search. AI models give sharper, more interview-relevant answers when you constrain the approach. If you want to see multiple approaches compared, ask for that explicitly.

  2. 02
    Request complexity analysis every time

    Always include 'provide time and space complexity' in your prompt. Models will generate working code without it, but interviewers will always ask. Getting Big-O in the same response forces the model to justify its approach and surfaces cases where the obvious solution is suboptimal.

  3. 03
    Paste your broken code, not just the problem

    If you already have an attempt, include it. Asking the AI to debug your specific code produces more targeted output than asking it to solve from scratch. You learn more from seeing your exact mistake corrected than from reading a clean solution that sidesteps what confused you.

  4. 04
    Ask for a step-by-step trace on a sample input

    Request a walkthrough of what happens to a specific example input, line by line or iteration by iteration. This is especially valuable for problems involving pointers, stacks, or DP tables where the logic is hard to follow from code alone. A trace turns abstract logic into something you can reproduce on a whiteboard.

More example scenarios

#01 · Two Sum variant for interview prep
Input
Solve this in Python with optimal time complexity and explain your approach: Given an array of integers nums and an integer target, return the indices of the two numbers that add up to target. You may not use the same element twice. Include time and space complexity analysis.
Expected output
A hash map solution storing each number's index as you iterate. For each element, check if target minus the current number exists in the map. Returns indices in one pass at O(n) time and O(n) space. Explanation covers why a nested loop approach is O(n^2) and why the hash map eliminates the inner loop.
#02 · Dynamic programming for coding bootcamp student
Input
I am learning dynamic programming. Can you solve the Coin Change problem in Python (LeetCode 322) and explain it step by step? Show both the recursive with memoization version and the bottom-up DP version. Tell me which one is preferred in an interview and why.
Expected output
Both versions in clean Python with comments. The memoized version uses a dictionary cache to avoid recomputation. The bottom-up version builds a dp array of size amount plus one. Both are O(amount x len(coins)) time. The answer recommends bottom-up for interviews because it avoids recursion stack overflow risk and is easier to trace through on a whiteboard.
#03 · Graph traversal problem for senior engineering role prep
Input
Solve Number of Islands (LeetCode 200) in Python. I want to see a DFS solution and a BFS solution. Annotate the code so I can understand the difference in traversal order. Also mention if Union-Find is worth knowing for this problem category.
Expected output
DFS solution using a recursive flood-fill that marks visited cells. BFS solution using a deque and iterative level-order traversal. Side-by-side comparison shows DFS goes deep before wide, BFS explores neighbors first. A short paragraph explains Union-Find is worth knowing for dynamic connectivity variants but DFS or BFS is sufficient for static grid problems.
#04 · Sliding window for Python developer brushing up on algorithms
Input
Solve Longest Substring Without Repeating Characters (LeetCode 3) in Python. Use the sliding window technique. Walk me through how the window expands and contracts, and show me what happens with the input 'abcabcbb' at each step.
Expected output
A sliding window solution using a set and two pointers. A step-by-step trace table showing left pointer, right pointer, current window, and max length for each character in 'abcabcbb'. Time complexity O(n), space O(min(n, alphabet size)). The trace makes the shrink condition concrete and easy to remember.
#05 · Debugging a broken binary search implementation
Input
My binary search in Python is returning -1 even when the target is in the list. Here is my code: def binary_search(arr, target): left, right = 0, len(arr); while left < right: mid = (left + right) // 2; if arr[mid] == target: return mid; elif arr[mid] < target: left = mid; else: right = mid - 1; return -1. What is wrong?
Expected output
Two bugs identified: right should initialize to len(arr) minus one, not len(arr), to avoid an index out of bounds. left = mid should be left = mid + 1 to prevent an infinite loop when arr[mid] is less than target. Corrected code provided with an explanation of why each fix prevents the specific failure mode.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Accepting the first output without testing

    AI-generated Python solutions often pass obvious test cases but fail on edge cases like an empty array, a single element, negative numbers, or duplicate values. Always run the output against at least five edge cases before trusting it. LeetCode's submit button will expose these quickly.

  • Asking a vague question and getting a vague answer

    Prompts like 'help me with Python algorithms' return generic content that does not solve your specific problem. The more precisely you define the input format, the constraints, and what you have already tried, the more targeted and useful the model output will be.

  • Copying code you cannot explain

    In a real interview, you will be asked to walk through your solution, modify it on the fly, or extend it to a follow-up problem. If you cannot explain every line of the AI output, you are not ready. Use AI to understand the pattern, not just to copy the answer.

  • Ignoring the model's reasoning for the wrong approach

    Sometimes a model will give you a correct but suboptimal solution, like an O(n log n) sort when an O(n) hash map works. If you do not read the explanation critically and ask a follow-up for the optimal version, you will practice the wrong pattern and potentially give a slow solution in an interview.

  • Not specifying Python version or library constraints

    Some interview platforms disallow certain libraries or require Python 3 specifically. If you do not specify, the model may use collections.Counter, heapq, or other imports that are not allowed in your context. State your constraints upfront to get a compliant solution.

Related queries

Frequently asked questions

Which AI is best for solving Python coding problems?

It depends on what you need. GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet tend to produce the clearest explanations alongside correct code, which is valuable for learning. Gemini 1.5 Pro handles multi-step problems well. The comparison table on this page shows head-to-head results on the same prompt so you can pick based on your specific priority, whether that is code correctness, explanation depth, or brevity.

Can AI actually solve LeetCode hard problems correctly?

Top models solve LeetCode easy and medium problems reliably. Hard problems are hit or miss, especially those requiring very specific greedy observations or advanced data structures like segment trees or suffix arrays. For hard problems, use AI to understand the approach and constraints, then implement yourself. Treating AI output on hard problems as definitely correct is risky.

Is using AI to practice coding problems cheating?

Using AI to learn, study, and understand solutions is not cheating, it is the same as reading an editorial or watching a YouTube explanation. Using AI during a proctored assessment that prohibits external tools is a violation of those terms. The line is the same as it has always been: studying is fine, using prohibited tools during an evaluation is not.

How do I prompt AI to explain time and space complexity for Python solutions?

Add a direct instruction to your prompt: 'After the solution, provide the time complexity and space complexity with a brief justification for each.' This reliably produces Big-O analysis. For interview prep, also ask the model to compare the complexity of at least one alternative approach so you understand why the chosen solution is preferred.

Can AI help me understand why my Python solution is failing on LeetCode?

Yes, and this is one of the highest-value use cases. Paste your code, the problem statement, the failing test case, and the expected output. Ask the model to identify the bug and explain why it causes the failure. This targeted debugging workflow is faster than reading discussion forums and more educational than just getting a clean solution.

What Python coding problem categories does AI handle best?

AI models are strongest on pattern-based problems: arrays, hash maps, two pointers, sliding window, binary search, basic graph traversal, and standard dynamic programming like knapsack or Fibonacci variants. They are weakest on problems requiring non-obvious mathematical insight, highly specialized data structures, or very tight constraint optimization where the trick is not in the canonical training data.

Try it with a real tool

Run this prompt in one of these tools. Affiliate links help keep Gridlyx free.